Legal Opinion

Lane v. State Retirement Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 29, 1996No. 9501231BPublished

1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Charles Lane filed this suit pursuant to G.L.c. 30A, §14 seeking judicial review of a decision by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (“CRAB”) finding that he was not eligible for superannuated retirement benefits under G.L.c. 32, §§28M and 28N. The plaintiff contends that CRAB’s decision is erroneous as a matter of law and unsupported by substantial evidence.

This matter is before the court on the defendants, State Retirement Board and Contributory Retirement Appeal Board’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Mass.R.Civ. 12(c). All parties filed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API