Legal Opinion

Heisler v. Jetco Service

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1993No. 60644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant on a jury verdict in a personal injury action, raising questions of trial error. We conclude that the trial court inappropriately limited the plaintiffs’ closing argument, in response to the defendant’s argument, and reverse and remand for a new trial.1

Regina Heisler was severely burned when her air conditioner compressor vented while being examined by a repairman, spewing its ignited flammable contents. The repairman, Blenchfield, had been recommended to the Heislers by their homeowners insurer, State Farm…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Greenberg Mercantile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Ballinger v. Gascosage Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Mathews v. Chrysler Realty Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Holtgrave v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keith v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Penzel Constr. Co. v. Jackson R-2 Sch. Dist., Warner-Nease-Bost Architects & Henthorn, Sandmeyer & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Moheet v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API