Legal Opinion

Davidek v. Wyoming Investment Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1956No. 2699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*72OPINION

Harnsberger, Justice.

Mary M. Davidek, plaintiff, instituted her action in ejectment and to cancel deeds which conveyed two adjoining lots in the city of Cheyenne against defendants, Wyoming Investment Company, Percy Spatz, Eva E. Spatz, C. H. Wunnicke, doing business as Mountain Motors, and Mountain Motors. After other pleadings and interlocutory orders, plaintiff filed an amended petition to which defendants made answer. Thereupon plaintiff filed her motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendants filed their motion for judgment upon the ground that the amended petition failed to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Leahy v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. RalstonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Patzman v. HoweySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Carroll v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1934
  5. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davidek v. Wyoming Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API