Carroll v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
Upon petition and answer both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings. The allegations of the pleadings must therefore be accepted as true.
The plaintiff is the executrix of the estate of May Massey, 'deceased. The decedent in her lifetime purchased several annuity contracts from the defendant. She paid an aggregate of $4,900 for said contracts. By the terms of said several annuity contracts, the decedent was to receive specified annual payments from the defendant. Such payments were to continue throughout her life. A single payment was made on one of the…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- State v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Daniel v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.