Legal Opinion

State v. Heigele

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 30, 1990No. 63,575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

The State appeals the trial court’s pretrial order suppressing evidence. The question raised in this appeal is whether a suppression order issued in a prior case precludes another judge from independently considering the suppression issue after the case has been refiled.

The procedural background is important to a resolution of the issues in the case. The State had filed charges against Douglas L. Heigele for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. Heigele filed a motion to suppress, which was set for hearing. The State requested a continuance because a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. State v. RudenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. State v. Zimmerman & SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. City of Salina v. AmadorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. State I-135/I-70 Drug Task Force v. 1990 Lincoln Town CarCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API