Legal Opinion

State v. Parry

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 18, 2015No. 113130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atcheson, J:

The doctrine of law of the case prevents a party from serially litigating an issue already presented and decided on appeal in the same proceeding. The doctrine promotes judicial efficiency while allowing litigants a full and fair opportunity to present their arguments on a point—the first bite of tire proverbial apple. We apply law of the case to affirm the Clay County District Court’s ruling suppressing evidence the State intended to use to *929prosecute Defendant Dominic Parry for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The State lost an earlier motion to suppress in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API