State v. Parry
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Atcheson, J:
The doctrine of law of the case prevents a party from serially litigating an issue already presented and decided on appeal in the same proceeding. The doctrine promotes judicial efficiency while allowing litigants a full and fair opportunity to present their arguments on a point—the first bite of tire proverbial apple. We apply law of the case to affirm the Clay County District Court’s ruling suppressing evidence the State intended to use to *929prosecute Defendant Dominic Parry for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The State lost an earlier motion to suppress in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- State v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020