6224 Fontenelle Blvd. v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 872 22 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS failed to comply with assisting Alexis in initiating calls to or receiving calls from Maria. Further, § 42-364.15(1) authorizes a trial court to enter orders as are reasonably necessary to enforce rights of either parent, and this includes the modification of previous court orders relating to parenting time, visitation, or other access. As discussed above, I would reverse the breakfast meeting modification, but I would affirm the other two modification provisions as being reasonably necessary to enforce matters…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. HealTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.