Legal Opinion
Martin v. Willingham
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 5, 2006No. Case 3:06cv492 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER [DOCS. # 1, 3]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Petitioner Sandra Martin seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361(1) declaring unlawful the February 2005 Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-570.21, which restrict the prerelease time inmates can serve in a Community Correction Center (“CCC”) to the lesser of 10% of the inmate’s time to be served or 6 months (the “10% rule”), and directing Respondent not to consider the 10% rule when selecting the appropriate portion of her sentence that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Benito Jiminian, - V- John Nash, Warden Fci Ray BrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hacker v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Yin Mei Ku v. WillinghamDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006