Legal Opinion
Yin Mei Ku v. Willingham
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 15, 2006No. 3:06cv23 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER [DOC. # 1]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Petitioner Yin Mei Ku seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 declaring unlawful the February 2005 Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-570.21, which restrict the prerelease time inmates can serve in a Community Correction Center (“CCC”) to the lesser of 10% of the inmate’s time to be served or 6 months (the “10% rule”), and directing Respondent not to consider the 10% rule when selecting the appropriate portion of her sentence that she may serve in a CCC. See Petition [Doc. # 1]. Petitioner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Anthony R. Elwood v. Cole Jeter, Warden, Fci Forrest City United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Goldings v. WinnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006