Covenant Presbytery v. First Baptist Church
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice
I respectfully dissent.' The majority’s analysis in this case is fatally flawed. The majority begins its analysis by addressing the issue of whether the churches had a vested interest in the farmland upon Mr. Carpenter’s death. However, the initial inquiry should be to determine the- intent of the settlor. Carpenter | tflclearly intended to .create a charitable trust to which the circuit court properly applied the doctrine of cy pres. Accordingly, I would affirm the circuit court’s rulings.
Carpenter’s Will gives four family members each a one-fourth interest in the net farm rents during his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Van Buren School District No. 42Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Slade v. GammillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Lowery v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Trevathan v. Ringgold-Noland Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967