Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Cleveland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1901No. 367PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTOU, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up on writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of South Carolina. Vannoy Cleveland, the defendant in error, obtained a judgment in the circuit court of the United States for the district of South 'Carolina on llth day of August, 1897, in the sum of $1,568.41 against .Dunklin township, in the county of Greenville, S. O. Execution having been issued on this judgment, it was returned nulla bona. Thereupon Vannoy Cleveland filed his petition in the said circuit court, praying that a writ of mandamus do issue to W. P. Hicks,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Spitzer v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Sidney Spitzer & Co. v. Commissioners of Franklin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API