Legal Opinion

AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. 3 Bees Logging Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Farnam from a decree of the trial court adjudicating that plaintiff’s and defendant Larison’s interests in certain logging equipment were superior to that of Farnam’s. After appeal to this court the defendant Farnam assigned his interest in this litigation to his wife, Betty L. Farnam, and she was substituted in his place as a party defendant and appellant. The opinion, however, is written as if Farnam were still a party.

In June of 1963 plaintiff, sold five logging trucks to the defendant 3 Bees Logging Co., Inc. (3 Bees). It took back a chattel mortgage on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardin v. Dimension Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. NEW ZEALAND INSURANCE CO. v. Griffith Rubber MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Spooner v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API