Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Dimension Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
On January 7, 1927, plaintiffs, as parties of the first part, entered into a written con tract with defendant as party of the second part, for the purchase and sale of certain saw timber. So far as material, the contract reads as follows:
“WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained the parties of the first part hereby agree to sell to the party of the second part, and the party of the second part hereby agrees to purchase of the first parties all the saw timber situated upon the following described premises, to-wit: [describing them.]
“And…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petty v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Chrisman v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Gaines v. VandecarOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Lachmund v. Lope SingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Union Water Power Co. v. Inhabitants of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- NEW ZEALAND INSURANCE CO. v. Griffith Rubber MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Champion Et Ux. v. Hammer Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Oregon-Pacific Forest Products Corp. v. Welsh Panel Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.