Legal Opinion

United States v. Dickerson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 9, 1983No. ACM S25792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The only issue before the Court is the sufficiency of the staff judge advocate’s review. Appellate defense counsel argue that the reviewer merely summarized the evidence and concluded, without stating any reasons, that it was sufficient. It is further maintained that no effort was made to relate the evidence to the elements of the offenses.

While we agree that the disputed review fails to meet the required standard,* we note that on 7 October 1982, a copy of the post-trial review was served on the trial defense counsel who did not challenge the adequacy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. HarveyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. KingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. BlackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API