Legal Opinion

Young v. Southgate Development Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

A judge of the Superior Court awarded the plaintiff Howard Young $2,500 as a fee for legal services rendered on behalf of the defendant Southgate Development Corporation (Southgate), basing his determination on a rate of $50 an hour for fifty hours of work. Each party has appealed. We transferred the appeals here on our own motion.2

The plaintiff argues that he is entitled to recover on a contingent fee agreement which Southgate never executed and that, in any event, the fair value of his services was greater than $2,500. Southgate argues that it should not be obliged to pay anything to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Valley Stream Teachers Federal Credit Union v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Harness Tracks Security, Inc. v. Bay State Raceway, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Serlin v. RotmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Guenard v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Mulhern v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Coupounas v. MaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API