Legal Opinion

MacNutt v. Police Commissioner

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 5, 1991No. 89-P-276PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

When the plaintiff applied for renewal of her license to carry a firearm, she was required by the defendant’s agents to take a firing test and to pay a range fee in addition to a license fee. She challenged the test and the additional fee in the Superior Court and, after a trial without jury, appeals from a judgment of that court declaring that (1) the requirement of a firing test was a proper exercise, by the defendant, of his statutory duty under G. L. c. 140, § 131, (2) the test was conducted in a way which was within the discretion of the defendant, (3) the policies, procedures and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Caswell v. Licensing Commission for BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Wolf v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SlocumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hightower v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Godfrey v. Chief of Police of WellesleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Chief of Police of the City of Worcester v. HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Police Commissioner v. RobinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Firearms Records Bureau v. SimkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API