Legal Opinion

Petterson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 18, 1952No. Docket No. 35873Published

Original deficiency in income tax liability held proper base for computing 50 per cent fraud penalty, despite later reduction in tax deficiency due to loss carry-back from subsequent year. Nick v. Dunlap (C. A. 5), 185 F.2d 674, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

P. C. and Ethel Petterson, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Petterson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 35873

United States Tax Court

19 T.C. 486; 1952 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 17;

December 18, 1952, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Original deficiency in income tax liability held proper base for computing 50 per cent fraud penalty, despite later reduction in tax deficiency due to loss carry-back from subsequent year. Nick v. Dunlap (C. A. 5), 185 F.2d 674, followed.

Seymour Wells, C. P. A., for the petitioners.

R. G. Harless, Esq., for the respondent.

Opper,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petterson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  2. Joseph L. Kamosky, and Joseph G. Kamosky, a Minor, by Joseph L. Kamosky, Guardian v. Owens-Illinois Glass CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API