Legal Opinion

Joseph L. Kamosky, and Joseph G. Kamosky, a Minor, by Joseph L. Kamosky, Guardian v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1950No. 10303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment entered on a directed verdict for the defendant in a suit for damages for personal injuries suffered by the minor plaintiff when a beer bottle alleged to have been negligently manufactured by the defendant» exploded. The trial judge held that the plaintiffs had failed to produce any substantial evidence from which the jury could have found that the bottle in question had been manufactured by the defendant. 89 F.Supp. 561. Our examination of the record satisfies us that thé trial judge was right in so holding. The testimony of the expert witness…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kamosky v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petterson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  2. Petterson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API