Legal Opinion
Maurice Whiting v. Sherry Burt, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2005No. 03-1894PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
The District Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, conditionally granted the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Maurice D. Whiting (“Petitioner” or “Defendant”), an inmate of the State Prison of Southern Michigan, the condition being that the State grant Petitioner a new appeal in the Michigan Court of Appeals and, if not done within the time specified by the District Court, Petitioner could apply for a writ ordering Sherry Burt, the warden of the prison (“Respondent”) to release him. Respondent appealed, and the District Court denied Respondent’s motion…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jells v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- James Earl Slaughter, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Phil Parker, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Joseph Stewart v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.