Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Leisenring

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1907No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Case by James A. Merrill against David C. Leisenring for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s wife. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for alienation of the affections of his wife and recovered judgment for $4,500. The declaration in the case was in two counts. Thefirst countcharged adultery. The second count charged alienation of affections by means other than adultery. Upon the trial of the case, plaintiff abandoned the count charging adultery and announced that he would rely only upon the second count.

Defendant was the owner of a fruit farm near South Haven, and plaintiff with his family was a tenant of defendant. He was hired November 1, 1901, to work this place for one year with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. LoyejoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Carter v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Merrill v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sweikhart v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Merrill v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Barnes v. TibbittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API