Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Womack v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 30, 1942No. 36881Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHiggins, Justice

This is a summary action under the provisions of the primary election law of this State, Act 46 of 1940, in which Judge James D. Womack claims that he is entitled to the right of entering- a second primary with Judge W. Carruth Jones for the Democratic nomination for one of the offices of the two district judgeships of the Nineteenth Judicial District, and that the Democratic Executive Committee for the Parish of East Baton Rouge has illegally deprived him of that right by unlawfully declaring Judge Jones one of the nominees in the primary election held on September 8, 1942, and refusing to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Le Blanc v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Trosclair v. Parish Democratic CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. State v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API