Legal Opinion

United States v. Gholston

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 27, 2014No. Case No. 13-20187PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Maurice Gholston, along with co-Defendant Robert Metcalf, is charged in a March 21, 2013 first superseding indictment with one count of interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and one count of use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Through the present motion filed on October 28, 2013, Defendant seeks to suppress evidence obtained during a search, pursuant to a warrant, of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. State v. ShortNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. United States v. LustigDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  4. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
  5. Moats v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API