Legal Opinion

United States v. Lustig

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 11, 2014No. Case No. 13cr3921-BENPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENTING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION TO DISMISS

ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.

Now before the Court are Defendant’s motions filed Dec. 31, 2013. Argument was heard on January 21, and February 18, 2014. The government filed a supplemental brief on January 31, 2014. Defendant filed supplemental briefs on February 18, February 19, February 26, and March 11, 2014. Defendant’s motion to suppress cell phone evidence is denied. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is denied. Defendant’s motion to suppress Yahoo.com email evidence is denied. Defendant’s motion to suppress…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. BENNINGER v. OHIO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Moore v. U.S. Virgin Islands Department of TourismDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2020
  4. People v. Gonzales CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API