Hummel v. First National Bank of Nevada
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
Appellant, Errett Allan Hummel, seeks reversal of an order confirming the partition sale of certain real property. The subject property, which is situated in Beverly Hills, consists of 11 lots which are part of a 16-lot parcel which occupies an entire trapezoidal shaped block bounded by Santa Monica Boulevard, Lasky Drive, Durant Drive, and Charleville Boulevard. At the commencement of the lawsuit, appellant had a beneficial 1-1/2 percent interest in the subject property. Respondent, Mont Pelerin Corporation, N.V., owned a 69 percent interest in the subject property and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Simonian v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bank of California v. VarakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Weber v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Computer Prepared Accounts, Inc. v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.