Legal Opinion

Hummel v. First National Bank of Nevada

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1987No. B014964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Appellant, Errett Allan Hummel, seeks reversal of an order confirming the partition sale of certain real property. The subject property, which is situated in Beverly Hills, consists of 11 lots which are part of a 16-lot parcel which occupies an entire trapezoidal shaped block bounded by Santa Monica Boulevard, Lasky Drive, Durant Drive, and Charleville Boulevard. At the commencement of the lawsuit, appellant had a beneficial 1-1/2 percent interest in the subject property. Respondent, Mont Pelerin Corporation, N.V., owned a 69 percent interest in the subject property and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Simonian v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Bank of California v. VarakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Weber v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Computer Prepared Accounts, Inc. v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API