State v. Anderson, C-070098 (11-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Robert Anderson appeals his conviction for assault. We conclude that his assignments of error do not have merit, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} Anderson was charged with misdemeanor assault in violation of R.C. 2903.13. The case was set for a jury trial on October 4, 2006. On that date, the case was continued at the request of the state until October 25. Anderson did not appear at the time scheduled for trial on October 25, so the trial court issued a capias for his appearance. The court recalled the capias when Anderson showed up later that day.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. LomaxOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PflanzOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ShoecraftOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. BeasleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2017