Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Cameron

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1968No. 9303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona, hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”, was granted a writ of certiorari by the Supreme Court of Arizona to determine whether the Court of Appeals erroneously concluded that it was without power to entertain a motion to dismiss a workman’s compensation claim before that Court.

The pertinent facts are as follows. The Commission had refused to reopen a claim for workman’s compensation on the ground that no new evidence had been offered to substantiate the petition for reopening.

The applicant for reopening of the claim, Patience Phyliss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Di Paolo v. Calumet & Arizona Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. StaatzArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morris v. Southwest Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Countryman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. City Van & Storage v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Luedecke v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API