Long v. Hines
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are stated in Long v. Hines, ante, p. 216; which case was decided at the session of the court in January, 1888. The defendants in error filed a motion for a rehearing, which the court overruled at its session in December, 1888, and then filed the opinion, infra.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HortON, C. J.:
Upon the motion for rehearing in this case, it is earnestly and forcibly insisted that the law has been improperly declared in the syllabus and opinion already filed. We have reexamined the whole question, and are satisfied with the judgment rendered. There are many decisions to the contrary, but we are not inclined to follow them. . In our view they are not sustained by good reasons.
At the time of the execution and recording of the chattel mortgage of March 7, 1885, the forty-five acres of growing corn therein mentioned had not been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Floyd v. RicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1853
- Brown v. DeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Corbin v. KincaidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Cole v. KerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Tomlinson v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Home Life Insurance v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- First National Bank v. McIntosh & Peters Live-stock & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- New England National Bank v. Northwestern National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Brown v. NeilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.