Love v. Deere and Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Presiding Judge.
After plaintiffs, Marion and Wilma Love, had verdicts from a jury for actual and punitive damages aggregating $550,000, the trial judge ordered a new trial on the ground that the evidence had not warranted submission of a claim for punitive damages and the resultant verdicts had been so infected by the error that deletion of the punitive award could not expunge the prejudice to defendants. The appeal is from the new trial order. Affirmed.
Some clarification of issue formulation in terms of procedure in the case is appropriate at the outset of this opinion to set the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Mather v. CarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mrad v. Missouri Edison Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Linkogel v. Baker Protective Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. International Harvester Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Fell v. Kewanee Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- School District of Independence, No. 30 v. U.S. Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bhagvandoss v. Beiersdorf, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.