Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 14, 1995No. 90-2631 VPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion addresses petitioners’ May 25, 1995 Motion for Review of the decision of the special master, pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (“Vaccine Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), dismissing the petition. Petitioners seek compensation for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of a diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccination. The matter has been fully briefed, and oral argument is deemed unnecessary. We conclude that the special master’s decision was not arbitrary or otherwise unlawful and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Black v. Secretary Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Leuz v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Kain v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Michele Y. Terran, as Legal Representative of Julie F. Terran, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.