Legal Opinion

Ramiro Valderrama, V. City Of Sammamish

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 16, 2024No. 86195-6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE RAMIRO VALDERRAMA, No. 86195-6-I Appellant, v. PUBLISHED OPINION CITY OF SAMMAMISH, Respondent. BOWMAN, J. — Ramiro Valderrama sued the city of Sammamish (City), alleging that the City violated the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, by failing to adequately search for and produce records of communications between council members and citizens stored on the council members’ private devices. The trial court granted summary judgment for the City. Because the City shows it performed an adequate search under the PRA, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Forbes v. City of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Arthur West v. City Of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Betts Patterson & Mines, Ps, V. State Of Wa Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API