Legal Opinion
Michaels v. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 12, 2008No. 3:05-CV-828 (RNC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
ROBERT N. CHATIGNY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701, et seq. (“Rehabilitation Act”), claiming disability discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation. Defendant has moved for summary judgment [doc. # 46]. For the reasons that follow, summary judgment is granted on the disability discrimination and retaliation claims but denied on the claim of sexual harassment.
Facts
Plaintiff was employed by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dougherty v. Ferrari Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Smallwood v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021