Legal Opinion

Briner v. City of Midfield

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 1, 2002No. 2000517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Presiding Judge.1

The issue on appeal is whether service of process in this case satisfied the notice requirements of § 15-13-134, Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Alabama Bail Reform Act of 1993.

Section 15-13-131 provides that if a defendant fails to appear in court as required, the court shall issue a conditional forfeiture against the defendant and the sureties and notify both the defendant and the sureties as set out in the Act. Section 15-13-132 provides that notice shall be served within 90 days of the conditional forfeiture order as provided for in the Act. Section 15-13-133 provides…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bay Town Bonding, Inc. v. State of AlabamaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API