Briner v. City of Midfield
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
YATES, Presiding Judge.1
The issue on appeal is whether service of process in this case satisfied the notice requirements of § 15-13-134, Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Alabama Bail Reform Act of 1993.
Section 15-13-131 provides that if a defendant fails to appear in court as required, the court shall issue a conditional forfeiture against the defendant and the sureties and notify both the defendant and the sureties as set out in the Act. Section 15-13-132 provides that notice shall be served within 90 days of the conditional forfeiture order as provided for in the Act. Section 15-13-133 provides…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Bay Town Bonding, Inc. v. State of AlabamaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2026