Legal Opinion
Levy v. Weksel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 7, 1992No. Nos. 85 Civ. 0990 (VLB), 85 Civ. 0991 (VLB), 85 Civ. 1369 (VLB) and 85 Civ. 7063 (VLB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Defendants William Weksel and Albert Bromberg (the “management defendants”) have moved for summary judgment in these cases involving alleged fraud in connection with the conduct of business by Information Displays, Inc. (“IDI”), and have requested a pretrial ruling that testimony of the plaintiff Leonard Stuart Levy (“Levy”) now classified as confidential under a protective order, be available to them at trial. Defendant Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”) has moved for summary judgment dismissing Levy’s remaining federal claims against it.
Pla…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Rad Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Gottlieb v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Chambers v. Capital Cities/ABCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994