Legal Opinion

Crow v. Brezenski

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 20, 2023No. 6:22-cv-01043Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 22-cv-1043-TC-RES _____________ DANIELLE CROW, Plaintiff v. ASHLEY BREZENSKI, ET AL., Defendants _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Danielle Crow, on behalf of minor child P.F., brings an action for negligence against Ashley Brezenski and M.B., Brezenski’s minor child. Defendants each filed motions for summary judgment. For the follow- ing reasons, their motions, Doc. 77 and Doc. 88, are denied. Crow’s motion to strike, styled as a motion for partial summary judgment, Doc. 86, is denied as moot. I A Summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API