Legal Opinion

Cunning v. Carr

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1924No. Civ. No. 2778PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This matter is before the court upon an original application for the issuance of a writ of supersedeas herein. It appears from the intervener’s petition that the plaintiff Cunning, upon his own and the assigned claims of five others, began an action in the superior court of Humboldt County against the auditor and treasurer thereof to compel the auditor to issue warrants for certain services performed by the petitioner and his assignors and also to compel the treasurer to pay the same. The petitioner herein thereupon filed his complaint in intervention. The cause went to trial and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cotton-Macauley Co. v. DeshieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Construction Finance Co. v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API