People v. Castillo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
Defendant Daniel Ray Castillo appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), 2 penetration by a foreign object (§ 289, subd. (a)), and upon a finding that he came within the provisions of sections 667 and 667.5 by virtue of having been convicted previously of a serious felony (§ 288a). 3 The primary contentions on appeal concern (a) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of penetration by a foreign object; (b) the exclusion of evidence showing that defendant is mildly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MEJIA-LENARESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. MathewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. MayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.