Legal Opinion

People v. Castillo

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1987No. A033540PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, J.

Defendant Daniel Ray Castillo appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), 2 penetration by a foreign object (§ 289, subd. (a)), and upon a finding that he came within the provisions of sections 667 and 667.5 by virtue of having been convicted previously of a serious felony (§ 288a). 3 The primary contentions on appeal concern (a) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of penetration by a foreign object; (b) the exclusion of evidence showing that defendant is mildly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. MEJIA-LENARESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. MathewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. MayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API