Legal Opinion
Scottsdale Insurance v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 20, 2004No. A4-03-032PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action initiated by Scottsdale Insurance Company, the insurer for Defendant Commercial Group West, LLC. The action arises out of damages sustained by modular units manufactured by Commercial Group West for Lake Metigoshe Properties, LLC. On January 9, 2004, Scottsdale Insurance filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and asserted that it is neither obligated to defend Commercial Group West in parallel state court proceedings nor pay for any water damage to the modular units. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND OF THE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Terry Graning, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Sherburne County Bruce Anderson, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Bellemare v. Gateway Builders, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Black & Veatch Corp. v. Aspen Ins. (Uk) Ltd.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Lee Builders, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
- Die-Cutting Diversified, Inc. v. United Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
- Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. WyllieDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005