Legal Opinion

Andreae v. Wolgin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 154, Calendar No. 36,019PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In May, 1928, the defendant Wolgin, a real estate broker in Detroit, called on the plaintiff, cashier of a bank at Yale, to obtain a loan. In a deal theretofore had with the bank, it had sustained a loss in the sum of $1,000, which plaintiff felt that Wolgin was obligated to pay. He had with him at that time a land contract, dated June 13,1927, executed by Frank M. Pauli and wife as vendors, for the sale of lot 201 of a subdivision in the township of Greenñeld, in the county of Wayne, to W. E. Brandt and Marjorie E. Brandt, his wife, on which it appeared there was more than $7,000 unpaid.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Hunter v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Oliver v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. E. B. Millar & Co. v. OlneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. UAW-CIO Local 31 Credit Union v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Mori v. Chicago National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. of Mich. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Mercantile Financial Corp. v. Sea Work Marine Services Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API