Legal Opinion

GT & MC, INC. v. Texas City Refining, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 1991No. 01-90-01096-CVPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court may award consequential damages arising from breach of an express warranty for design requirements, when the contract in question limits the aggrieved party’s damages to repair or replacement only for workmanship and materials defects. We hold that the trial court correctly interpreted and enforced the parties’ agreement and, therefore, affirm.

This is an appeal from a lawsuit for damages arising out of the failure of an oil tank designed, manufactured, and installed by appellant, GT & MC, Inc. at the Texas City, Texas,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hussong v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Belmont Constructors, Inc. v. Lyondell Petrochemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Pack v. Crossroads, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Miller v. Raytheon Aircraft Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API