Legal Opinion

Warren L. Bostick Family Trust v. Magliocco

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1983No. 81-394-1; CA A26701PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendants 1 appeal a summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on a promissory note which ordered the foreclosure of a mortgage on land securing the note. Defendants contend: (1) the affidavits and documents in support of the motion are insufficient under ORCP 47; (2) plaintiffs are not entitled to an award of attorney fees under ORCP 68C; and (3), in any event, the award is excessive.

Plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that they are the owners and holders of the note and mortgage and that defendant Magliocco had assumed the note and mortgage and had “made interest installment payments.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Pelege v. ChryslerOregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chaney v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Sheppard v. WeeklyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Weiner Investment Co. v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API