First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A. v. Tatum & Bell Center Associates
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Presiding Judge.
When property is sold at a trustee’s sale for a price too low to relieve the debt that it secures, the lender may sue the borrower for the deficiency. The borrower, however, is statutorily credited with the property’s fair market value if the trustee’s sale has brought a lesser sum. This fair market value credit serves to protect the borrower against a deficiency artificially inflated by a deflated trustee’s sale.
Guarantors as well as borrowers are extended a fair market value credit under the express terms of Arizona’s current deficiency statute,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. ShieldsNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Kintner v. WolfeArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Geronimo Hotel & Lodge v. PutziArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Kries v. Allen Carpet, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chase Bank of Arizona v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- MacCollum v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- In Re RheadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Mutual of Omaha Bank v. MuranteNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Meritor Savings Bank v. Camelback Canyon InvestorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.