Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This petition for a writ of mandamus was heard upon petition and answer. It comes here on the respondent’s exceptions to an order that the writ issue. The facts thus displayed are that the petitioner, a resident of Boston, while in the exercise of due care, was injured on March 25, 1928, by the negligence of one Harry E. Flaherty, a resident of this Commonwealth, in driving a motor vehicle on a public highway in Boston; that on March 6, 1929, she brought an action of tort in the Superior Court against said Flaherty, and the officer to whom the writ was given for service made return that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Devine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Duggan v. OgdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Davis v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Diggins v. TherouxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Schaeffer v. Alva West & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Young v. Potter Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API