Strickland v. City of Stillwater
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Washington county, in favor of plaintiff, as executor of tbe last will of Mary H. Bromley, deceased, in whose place be was substituted as plaintiff, entered in pursuance of tbe findings and order Of Williston,. J.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Tbe charter of tbe city of Stillwater does not require that tbe assessment made for paying tbe expense of grading streets shall be made upon tbe basis of an equal sum per front foot upon each lot or parcel, measuring along tbe line of such improvement, but tbe provisions in tbe charter are full and broad enough to authorize such a method of assessment, and it also authorizes tbe making of an assessment generally upon all of tbe property benefited by tbe improvement. In either case tbe assessment must include all of tbe property benefited by such improvement, and if, as in this case, tbe…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pettibone v. Cook County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- McConville v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Grimes v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.