Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul T. Raibley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 2001No. 99-3752PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

Police stopped Paul Raibley for questioning after he was seen surreptitiously videotaping a seventeen year-old Wal-Mart employee. A consensual search of his pickup truck produced a small quantity of marijuana and two videotapes. The police later took a look at the tapes, purportedly with Raibley’s consent, and discovered pornographic scenes on one of the tapes involving two young girls. After unsuccessfully moving to suppress the videotapes and other evidence obtained as a result of the investigatory stop, Raibley pleaded guilty to the production of child…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. Terrance ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Juan Pedroza and Hilario PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Joseph L. CellittiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. McGrawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API