Legal Opinion
Snelling & Snelling of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1964No. Civ. No. 64-92PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings suit herein against the defendant on two policies of insurance, both of which were issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. One of the policies is known as a Comprehensive Dishonesty, Disappearance and Destruction Policy under the insuring agreement of which there is $5000.00 coverage for the dishonesty of each identifiable employee. The other policy is known as a Valuable Papers and Records Policy and affords coverage in the amount of $10,000.00. There appears to be no question about the issuance of the policies and that the alleged incidents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Shawnee Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson RowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Orient Ins. Co. v. Van Zant-Bruce Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- German American Ins. Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dickey v. Springfield Fire Marine of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Studio Frames Ltd. v. Standard Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Studio Frames Ltd. v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Valle v. Montgomery County (In Re Valle)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2011