Legal Opinion

Southworth v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Andrew D. Morgan, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the 20th day of July, 1910, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Oneida Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The action is to recover the balance unpaid on two shares of capital stock held by the defendant in the Remington Automobile and Motoi Company. Said corporation was organized in pursuance of the laws of the State of New Jersey, with an authorized capital stock of 2,500 shares of the par value of $100 each. In the fall of 1900 the defendant entered into an agreement whereby he agreed to take two shares of such stock, and the certificate therefor was duly delivered to him on the 20th of September, 1900, he paying therefor $50, and no other sum has since been paid.

The defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Penn Collieries Co. v. . McKeeverNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Wood Selick v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Acorn Brass Manufacturing Co. v. RutenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Harr v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Milliken v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Milliken v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API