Perry v. Heirs at Law and Distributees of Gadsden
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Petitioner asks this Court for writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeal’s decision in Perry v. Heirs at Law & Distributees of Gadsden, _ S.C. _, 437 S.E. (2d) 174 (Ct. App. 1993). We grant the petition, dispense with further briefing, and affirm as modified.
In its opinion, the Court of Appeals found that the record does not support petitioner’s claim of title under adverse possession because there was no evidence of hostile possession, citing Lusk v. Callaham, 287 S.C. 459, 339 S.E (2d) 156 (Ct. App. 1986). It based this on the fact that petitioner had repeatedly assured the heirs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wigfall v. FobbsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Lusk v. CallahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Brown v. ClemensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- First Union Nat. Bank of SC v. SodenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Knox v. BoganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- All Saints Parish v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Blackmon Ex Rel. Will & Estate of Blackmon v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.