Legal Opinion

Lehman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Ronald Lehman, an employee of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), was injured when train passengers allowed a trunk to fall on his foot. Lehman filed an action against his employer under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq.1 He contended that his injury had been caused by the negligence of Amtrak in failing to provide him with a safe place to work. The trial court, on motion of Amtrak, entered summary judgment dismissing the cause of action.2 Lehman appealed. After careful review, we affirm.

State courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. N. Desher (Guardian ad litem of P. Devlin) v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API