Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Improvement Co. v. Moore

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1929No. 10244-5-6-7-8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

There is no question in any of these cases but that the surety company was properly notified as provided by the covenant of the bond. The action begun on June 30th, 1927, was uncontested and a default judgment was entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County which judgment was thereafter paid.

The five suits before this court are each in like tenor and effect and are suits for successive quarterly installments of rentals under the terms of the lease.

It has developed that the Improvement Company is now insolvent. Both, companies, however, "answered to this action and the question…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Deputy Commissioner(S) Of Sci-HuntingdonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. General Development Corp. v. Wilbur-Rogers Atlanta Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API