Legal Opinion
Kircher v. Ripton
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard D. Rosenbloom, J.
This is a motion by third-party defendant Richard Ellis, *365M.D., to vacate service of plaintiff’s amended summons and complaint or for summary judgment. Plaintiff cross-moves for judgment by default or for an order directing Dr. Ellis to answer without interposing a defense based on the Statute of Limitations.
Plaintiff commenced an action alleging medical malpractice and wrongful death against defendant Ripton in March, 1980. In April, 1981, defendant Ripton commenced a third-party action against third-party defendants Eastman Kodak Corporation,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Scher v. KronmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plitman v. LeibowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Kladek v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Landi v. We're Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983